|
Post by turbodood on Dec 12, 2007 5:16:37 GMT -5
First of all I'm glad I decided due to christmas expenses and what not I couldn't go to the WEW show because --- it looks like it could get snowed out --- kind hard for somethign monumental to happen if it doesn't happen. But maybe not, their december show last year had a snow storm the same day and they managed to work around the late arrivals. Anyway more importantly. SG I think I can probably speak for all of DWOW's fans when I say thank you for sticking with this as long as you have/did (it remains to be seen if the final DWOW show ever has happened) --- however when you have stuff in your vault that people would pay good money for --- in my case evolution of the ho volume 2, more than one person has asked for this wizzard world --- and mod talked about how you were trying to transfer a couple hundred (or something like that) shows for release when you currently only have less than 40 for sale. I guess what I'm trying to say is --- first of all for this stuff people want, you could simply put a wizzard world tape on ebay, or put a evo ho v2 on ebay, and let it go. You might be surprised what you get (or hell for that matter my offer of a couple hundred bucks for it is still on the damn table WTF!?!?!?) ... ahem. And well I don't know what your source material is for all those old shows ... I assume beta tapes or digibeta (most of the stuff new enough to be DV is out already) ... its just not that hard to transfer stuff anymore .. so I dunno. By the same token --- that stuff is prety obvious so .. at least on the transferring of old stuff you must have some reason. Maybe they are locked in a vault you can only access once a year hell if I know. But in the case of wizzard world its been so much requested you must have that --- and we KNOW you have evolution of the ho volume 2 because you sold it. So ... thats something. I guess the point is talking about not making enough money is somewhat hard to hear when you have essentially turned down people's money.
|
|
|
Post by Moderator on Dec 13, 2007 21:07:57 GMT -5
Just got word that DWOW will make an announcement in the next 72 hours that affect and will have effect on the company and it's overall status. Not sure what. I know what I am thinking and it has to do with Hagar and Roth re-uniting for the good of Women's Wrestling, but I have a gut feeling it has nothing to do with it, but we will see soon enough.
So we have WEW to look forward to tomorrow. Wonder what could be going on over there? And now this announcement within 72 hours. Could be something and could be nothing. We will see soon enough.
|
|
|
Post by The Sound Guy on Dec 14, 2007 7:59:43 GMT -5
Just got word that DWOW will make an announcement in the next 72 hours that affect and will have effect on the company and it's overall status. Not sure what. I know what I am thinking and it has to do with Hagar and Roth re-uniting for the good of Women's Wrestling, but I have a gut feeling it has nothing to do with it, but we will see soon enough. So we have WEW to look forward to tomorrow. Wonder what could be going on over there? And now this announcement within 72 hours. Could be something and could be nothing. We will see soon enough. Okay, Ok, OKAY... for the last time "Hagar & Roth" (O'Neill & Kowal) are NOT getting back together to do women's wrestling --period. I was told something that is supposed to be announced tonight at WEW, in WEW, etc... If that is announced (what I was told), it will have its own ramifications. If it is announced and actually happens and people say what they mean, that company has some major changes ahead. Keep in mind, what is said and what may actually happen is 2 different things. Kowal and his crew were on WYSP and Sirus radio promoting the show for tonight earlier in the week. I really question what I was told, as you will know why soon enough and I will decipher my cryptic messages later. lol Don't say I never give you guys dirt. I give it to you, you just have to read into it! In 12 hours or so, we will see what REALLY lies ahead. REGARDLESS, we DWOW will make an announcement that will affect and effect our company.
|
|
|
Post by The Sound Guy on Dec 14, 2007 12:41:04 GMT -5
First of all I'm glad I decided due to christmas expenses and what not I couldn't go to the WEW show because --- it looks like it could get snowed out --- kind hard for somethign monumental to happen if it doesn't happen. But maybe not, their december show last year had a snow storm the same day and they managed to work around the late arrivals. Anyway more importantly. SG I think I can probably speak for all of DWOW's fans when I say thank you for sticking with this as long as you have/did (it remains to be seen if the final DWOW show ever has happened) --- however when you have stuff in your vault that people would pay good money for --- in my case evolution of the ho volume 2, more than one person has asked for this wizzard world --- and mod talked about how you were trying to transfer a couple hundred (or something like that) shows for release when you currently only have less than 40 for sale. I guess what I'm trying to say is --- first of all for this stuff people want, you could simply put a wizzard world tape on ebay, or put a evo ho v2 on ebay, and let it go. You might be surprised what you get (or hell for that matter my offer of a couple hundred bucks for it is still on the damn table WTF!?!?!?) ... ahem. And well I don't know what your source material is for all those old shows ... I assume beta tapes or digibeta (most of the stuff new enough to be DV is out already) ... its just not that hard to transfer stuff anymore .. so I dunno. By the same token --- that stuff is prety obvious so .. at least on the transferring of old stuff you must have some reason. Maybe they are locked in a vault you can only access once a year hell if I know. But in the case of wizzard world its been so much requested you must have that --- and we KNOW you have evolution of the ho volume 2 because you sold it. So ... thats something. I guess the point is talking about not making enough money is somewhat hard to hear when you have essentially turned down people's money. First off, WEW wouldn't have cancelled they have too much money invested into flights & hotel rooms & production, your lose on that. Second, monumental happening tonight? It is monumental to the business side, but possibly not to fans (at first anyway). All this is IF it actually will happen (whatever it is). Third, I can say honestly I don't think you've seen the last DWOW show, BUT don't count on anything in the near future. Fourth, relax on the f**kin videos. They will be released when they are released. There are reasons, and you don't need to know why. You have no clue what has to REALLY be done first. So please be patient and relax. And I hope you are still interested in those dvds when they do become available. Thank you for your kind words. SG
|
|
|
Post by RockinDoc on Dec 14, 2007 20:51:22 GMT -5
Hey Sound Guy, Though I understand your personal feeling with the possible impending news of a "re-unite," from your unreputableness, I have a hard time believing that you are being honest about the reuniting. RockinDoc unreputableness? I looked for that word in the dictionary, couldn't find it. lol I guess when whoever reports tomorrow that nothing is going on, then we will see about my unreputableness. lol Sound Guy, Sound Guy, Sound Guy.... You might want to look up the word "unreputable" in other resources or look it up here, www.dictionary.com. The word "reputable" means "of good character or of good reputation." Beings that you are neither and "semi-weetoded," I put in my two cents! RockinDoc
|
|
|
Post by The Sound Guy on Dec 15, 2007 9:31:32 GMT -5
unreputableness? I looked for that word in the dictionary, couldn't find it. lol I guess when whoever reports tomorrow that nothing is going on, then we will see about my unreputableness. lol Sound Guy, Sound Guy, Sound Guy.... You might want to look up the word "unreputable" in other resources or look it up here, www.dictionary.com. The word "reputable" means "of good character or of good reputation." Beings that you are neither and "semi-weetoded," I put in my two cents! RockinDoc Dickwad I know what you meant, but that word as it is spelled is NOT a word. Infact, let's look at your suggestion douche... Here are the results from your recommendations. from dictionary.reference.com/browse/unreputablenessNo results found for unreputableness. Did you mean unreadableness (in dictionary)? Dictionary suggestions: unreadableness incorruptibleness insupportableness un reputableness un-reputableness There are no dictionary entries for un reputableness, but un, reputableness are spelled correctly. Web Results for: un reputableness No results found for un-reputableness. Did you mean unreadableness (in dictionary)? Dictionary suggestions: unreadableness incorruptibleness insupportableness un- reputableness un--reputableness Dumbass. Using big words that aren't even words together. lmao FOOL! SG
|
|
|
Post by The Sound Guy on Dec 15, 2007 9:33:19 GMT -5
unreputableness? I looked for that word in the dictionary, couldn't find it. lol I guess when whoever reports tomorrow that nothing is going on, then we will see about my unreputableness. lol Sound Guy, Sound Guy, Sound Guy.... You might want to look up the word "unreputable" in other resources or look it up here, www.dictionary.com. The word "reputable" means "of good character or of good reputation." Beings that you are neither and "semi-weetoded," I put in my two cents! RockinDoc And more thing asswipe, if you google your word unreputableness, it only appears ONCE --when YOU MADE IT UP! Friggin fool! www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=unreputablenessDangerous Women of Wrestling - Is the "band" getting back together???Though I understand your personal feeling with the possible impending news of a "re-unite," from your unreputableness, I have a hard time believing that you ... dangerousboard.proboards30.com/index.cgi?board=officialnews&action=display&thread=1196804138&... - 52k - Cached - Similar pages --This is what I'm talking about. Everyone has something to say! At least use real words when you're trashing me, or at least make it funny.
|
|
vnndlr
Junior Member
Posts: 55
|
Post by vnndlr on Dec 15, 2007 23:15:46 GMT -5
DWOW could give itself a great boost if they brought back wrestlers like the original GI Ho, Bobcat, Lady Storm, Dawn Mae, and added talents such as Christie Ricci, Lexi Lane, Pryme Tyme Amy Lee, and when she is ready, Little Jeanne! Also, have the girls go back to wearing eye catching outfits, and the heels using low blows as their trademark move!
|
|
|
Post by RockinDoc on Dec 24, 2007 15:14:55 GMT -5
Sound Guy, Sound Guy, Sound Guy.... You might want to look up the word "unreputable" in other resources or look it up here, www.dictionary.com. The word "reputable" means "of good character or of good reputation." Beings that you are neither and "semi-weetoded," I put in my two cents! RockinDoc And more thing asswipe, if you google your word unreputableness, it only appears ONCE --when YOU MADE IT UP! Friggin fool! www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=unreputablenessDangerous Women of Wrestling - Is the "band" getting back together???Though I understand your personal feeling with the possible impending news of a "re-unite," from your unreputableness, I have a hard time believing that you ... dangerousboard.proboards30.com/index.cgi?board=officialnews&action=display&thread=1196804138&... - 52k - Cached - Similar pages --This is what I'm talking about. Everyone has something to say! At least use real words when you're trashing me, or at least make it funny. Steve, If you weren't such a lame brain, you would understand the ability to use words loosely from their original origin, to get one's point across. Yes, I did look up unreputableness on dictionary.com, before I posted my original comment and yes, the full word as I used it, did not come up. If you would have researched (used any resource) the word origin, you would have found this... Reputable – Adjective Definition: “With good reputation” or “Known to be honest, reliable or respectable” I put "un" onto the front of the word reputable, to state your known history to say one thing and do another (in regards to DWOW.) I put "ness" onto the end of the word reputable to state the "act" that you are known for performing. Now that I have explained myself and explained my rebuttal to your first and subsequent comments, could you admit that I put you to shame? Bob
|
|